English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Numero 11 Julio - Diciembre 2004 Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional ISSN 1405-9193 EL CONTROL DIFUSO DE LA CONSTITUCIONALIDAD EN MEXICO. REFLEXIONES EN TORNO A LA TESIS P./J. 38/2002 Ruben A. SANCHEZ GIL * The judicial review of legisla-tion (diffuse control) has been matter of a long debate in Mexico, until the Supreme Court of Justice made an interpretation regarding article 133 of the Constitution in the sense that ordinary authorities are not allowed to declare the unconstitutionality of some law or act. More than a year ago, Supreme Court established a reiterated criteria (jurisprudential thesis) which although maintains traditional judicial opinion on review of legislation, authorizes Tax and Administrative Justice Federal Court to omit the application of an act declared unconstitutional by a reiterated criteria of the Supreme Court of Justice, whose consequences deserve reflection because of their importance for the practical effectiveness of article 133 with regard to judicial review of legislation. * Profesor de la Facultad de Derecho de la UNAM. * Nota: Debido que la traduccion es automatica podra ser inexacta o contener errores.

El control difuso de la constitucionalidad en México. Reflexiones en torno a la tesis P./J. 38/2002