English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper examines the evaluation of library buildings, particularly the evaluation of academic libraries, by scrutinizing several approaches employed in recent years. Despite the importance and cost of the space for the libraries, evaluation of library buildings has been neglected until recently. Even now, there are few effective instruments for performing such assessments. Therefore, this paper provides a comparison of two models used for this purpose. We compare an assessment questionnaire based on the Faulkner-Brown and McDonald “commandments” to an adapted version of the Questionnaire on Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Library Buildings developed by IFLA. The evaluations are performed on a real university library in order to assess the suitability of these instruments and the scope of their practical application.

La evaluación de infraestructuras y edificios de biblioteca: Faulkner-Brown frente al cuestionario de la IFLA