English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

While experimental auctions are demand revealing in theory, recent studies question whether bids fully reflect willingness to pay due to the presence of outside substitutes available in conventional markets.  The presence of outside substitutes implies that bids should theoretically be censored from above at the market price.  While bid price censoring has been recognized in the literature, previous research has not examined the specific dollar level at which bids should be censoredthe price at which a product can actually be purchased outside of the experimental auction or the price at which participants believe it can be purchased.  We provide evidence from a field interview and experimental auction that individual-specific perceived prices differ from actual market prices.  The dichotomy between perceived and true market prices is shown to have significant implications for econometric analysis of bid price data.

The Impact of Perceived Prices on Willingness to Pay in Experimental Auctions