English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The resurgence of American civil-military relations scholarship over the past twenty years has been led by political scientists from the subfield of International Relations and American military sociologists.  Samuel Huntington's seminal work,  The Soldier and the State (1957), laid the foundation for considering civil-military affairs as a major influence on sound strategic policy.  By recommending autonomy for a separate sphere of military operations, it also threw down the gauntlet for structuring a cohesive society that could encompass both liberal values and the military profession.  To this point the political science subfield of American Politics has remained aloof from the fray.  Were American Politics to engage civil-military relations in earnest, there would likely follow an important recasting of civil-military relations scholarship, with greater emphasis on the fluidity of institutional patterns and the kind of political concessions required from all partiesexecutive, legislative, and militaryto maintain healthy civil-military relations under the Constitutional separation of powers.

Scholarship on Strategic Studies and Civil-Military Relations: Is American Politics the Neglected 'Poor Relation'?