English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

How effective was the George W. Bush administration in using the levers of Washington governance to attain its goals?  By late in Bush's presidency, his administration had received a reputation as less than competent due to their mismanagement of the response to Hurricane Katrina and the occupation of Iraq.  Despite these "headline" reversals, a closer look at the evidence reveals an administration that often was quite effective in pursuing its goals with the federal bureaucracy, Congress and federal courts.  The administration consistently pushed for expanded executive power consistent with its embrace of a unitary executive interpretation of their Constitutional power.  Yet the hierarchical, managerial and partisan style of the administration proved self-limiting, as it increased partisan rancor in Washington and provided only a narrow margin for error that vanished after the 2006 elections.

George W. Bush and Washington Governance: Effective Use of a Self-Limiting Style