English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Passive biochemical reactors (PBRs) are a viable alternative to neutralization plants for the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) because they require lower investment costs and use residual materials. However, high iron (Fe) concentrations (≥0.5 g/L) in AMD are challenging for their long-term efficiency. Sorption and precipitation are the main Fe removal mechanisms, but the relative importance of each is mostly unknown. In this study, locally available natural materials (organic and inorganic) were characterized and tested for their performance in Fe removal from highly contaminated AMD (pH 3.5, 4 g/L of Fe, and 9 g/L of sulfate). Iron retention capacity of the materials was then evaluated and the efficiency of eight mixtures of materials was compared through 40-day laboratory batch tests. All batch-type PBRs increased the pH up to 6.5 and decreased dissolved metals concentrations, including Fe, up to 99%. Results showed that organic residual materials (manures, municipal wastewater sludge, and compost) were the best substrates for Fe removal.These findings allowed for the selection of three reactive mixtures with distinct characteristics (mixture #1 – 30% organic wastes; mixture #4 – 50% calcite; and mixture #7 – 50% sand) to be further evaluated in column type PBRs.

Iron removal in highly contaminated acid mine drainage using passive biochemical reactors