English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: This study investigated the effect of Densah Burs on the primary and secondary implant stability, in addition toperiimplant mean marginal bone loss in maxillary implant supported partial overdentures.Materials and Methods: Ten patients with posteriorly edentulous maxillae following kennedy class I classification wereselected. Each patient received two implants; one in each side. On one side, the implant osteotomy was prepared usingconventional surgical drills while on the other side, Densah burs were used. Implant stability was measured at implant insertionand time of loading using Osstell device. Mean margial bone loss was measured at 6 and 12 month interval using Cone BeamCT scan.Results: Statistical Significant difference was noted between both types of drills on primary implant stability but not onsecondary implant stability or mean marginal bone loss at 6 and 12 month interval.Conclusion: Densah drilling Burs may improve initial implant stability; a situation that may help when immediate loading ofimplants is planned especially if they are splinted. Moreover, they might not have a different effect rather than conventionaldrilling burs on marginal bone loss.

Effect of Using Densah Burs on Implant Stability and Peri-implant Marginal Bone Loss in Maxillary Implant Supported Partial Overdentures