English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

On 6 May 2019, the General Court issued its judgment in the Scor vs Commission Case, ending a 6 year-long legal battle initiated by Scor against the French State regarding unlimited guarantees in favour of its competitor CCR. This Case reminds us of the procedural difficulties facing third-party competitors when willing to challenge a Phase I State aid Decision on the merits. It also contributes to set a rare EU decisional precedent declaring a State aid in the form of an unlimited public guarantee compatible with the internal market.  Keywords: Unlimited guarantees; Legal standing; Individually concerned; Reinsurance Natural disasters

european state aid law quarterly

Legal Standing of Complainant, Unlimited Guarantee · Case T-135/17 Scor SE v European Commission · Annotation by Marie-Laure Combet and Lena Boucon Annotation on the Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 May 2019 in Case T-135/17 Scor SE v European Commission