English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

On 29 April 2015, the European Commission published its decisions on several notified measures, arguing that in none of those cases State aid was involved because the measures were unlikely to have a significant effect on trade between Member States. Although the “local impact” concept, which still needs to be validated by the Court of Justice of the EU, is a welcomed initiative, it raises several questions. Some of these questions come up when applying the “local impact” concept to measures undertaken in cross-border regions. This short opinion piece underlines certain shortcomings of the concept attempting to spark a discussion that could help improve the concept.  Keywords: Interstate Trade; Local Impact; Cross-Border Regions; Catchment Area.

The Concept of “Local Impact” in Cross-Border Regions