English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

On 26 October 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter ‘the CJEU’) rejected France Télécom’s (now rebranded Orange) appeal in the case relating to the reform of the arrangements for financing the pensions of civil servants working for that company. The Court followed its Advocate General (hereinafter ‘the AG’) and upheld the European Commission’s (hereinafter ‘the Commission’) decision. By doing so, the CJEU strongly affirmed that there is no room left for a defence based on the compensation of a structural disadvantage.  Keywords: Compensation; Structural Disadvantage; Selectivity; Dual Derogation.

european state aid law quarterly

Orange v. European Commission   ∙  C-211/15 P ∙   Annotation by Adrien Giraud and Sylvain Petit Annotation on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) of 26 October 2016 in Case C-211/15 P Orange v. European Commission