English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Case Margari v Greece, Application no 36705/16, Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (Third Section) of 20 June 2023 and Case Negru v Republic of Moldova, Application no 7336/11, Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (Second Section) of 27 June 2023  The cases  offer a significant step towards the protection of the right to privacy in the context of criminal proceedings, addressing the one the risk to jeopardise the right to reputation of accused persons during criminal proceedings, focusing the other on the potential impact of criminal records collected by State agents on the presumption of innocence. Right to information and right to access have been considered by the Strasbourg Court as the key issues for effective judicial protection, not only in the field of data protection but through data protection in all fields, above all in trial.

Margari v Greece and Negru v Republic of Moldova: A Step Towards ‘Substantive’ Interdependence?