English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aims to disclose not only the APIP's internal audit planning strategy in accordance with the mandate of the SAAIPI 2014, Law 30/2014, Law 23/2014, Government Regulation 60/2008, Presidential Regulation 16/2018, Presidential Regulation 54/2018, but also the synergy strategy among APIP, LKPP and APH in preventing corruption in the procurement sector. The research method used is a qualitative method with the literature studies, surveys, and retrospective studies. The results show that the mandate of internal supervision can be identified through the relationship matrix between SAAIPI 2014 and several regulations. The strategy in the synergy of supervision planning conducted by APIP, LKPP and APH can be determined through a SWOT analysis of the role of APIP. There are 4 choices of strategies for optimizing the role of APIP. APIP that has a capability score of 3 can use the SO and ST strategies. Whereas APIP that has capability scores of 1 and 2 can use the WO and WT strategies. Whole of Government can be built by APIP, APH and LKPP, either in the form of coordination between institutions, the formation of task forces, or social coalitions.

THE GOVERNMENT'S INTERNAL AUDIT PLANNING STRATEGY IN PREVENTING CORRUPTION IN THE PROCUREMENT SECTOR IN THE ERA OF DISRUPTION