English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This woik was conducted to evaluate the effect of clear (CP) and black polyethylene (BP) middies, floating row cover (FRC) and perforated plastic aixl IXJ perforated microtunnels on growth and yield of muskmelon; and to determine the effect of diese ueatments on population densities of aphids, sweetpotato whitefly and soil temperature. Treatments were: 1) CP+FRC, 2) CP+ polyethylene perforated microtunnel (MPP), 3) CP+ polyethylene not perforated microtunnel (MNPP), 4) BP+FRC, 5) CP alone, 6) BP alone, and 7) bare soil as the control. Pests were completely excluded by FRC in die plots covered Protected plants had 0 and 1 nymphs/cnr at 34 and 41 days after sowing, respectively, whereas the control showed 3 and 29 nymphs/an at the same dates. CP + FRC increased soil temperature, number of maiketable fruits (452 and 44.8% higher) with respect to BP + FRC aixl bare soil. Polyethylene microtunnels were found not recommended by its costs for cantaloupe production. It is proposed diat floating row cover should be selected for their effects on insects in addition to their effects on soil temperature and melon yield

Effect of Plastic Mulch, Floating Rowcovers, and Microtunnels on Insect Populations and Yield of Muskmelon