English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of the study was to measure the importance of county centers in terms of central positioning and accessibility. The actual county centers have been chosen not only based on their central position but also based on other reasons such as their cultural, traditional and especially historical importance. With all these through time they should enforce their central position also in terms of accessibility – as some administration procedures can be managed just in these cities – and to became truly the centers of their counties. We want to check if the actual county centers fulfill these considerations, how strong is these fulfillments and in case of failure which cities could take their places. We also made some comparisons with former administrative organizations at the beginning of the 20 century before car traffic appeared. Key-words: network modeling, weighted network, closeness centrality, eigenvector centrality, ranking

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS THROUGH TIME AND SPACE OF CENTRALITY’S ROLE IN COUNTY CENTERS’ SPATIAL POSITION FOR SEVERAL COUNTIES IN ROMANIA