English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Intellectual creation is widely protected by national and international diplomas. This paper questions the (im)possibility of preventing criminals from profiting from the publicity of their crimes. This discussion involves collisions of rights. The research’s methodological focus is on the analysis of national and international diplomas available on the subject. Solid arguments are sought in order to reconcile the public interest and the freedom of expression of the author with personality and patrimonial rights over his or her work. For this, the present study uses the dialectic method and the monographic procedure, which consists of the analysis of the norms, of the doctrine related to the topic, as well as national and foreign jurisprudence. The conclusion is that restricting the author’s patrimonial right does not promote convincing public interest, according to the Brazilian legal system.

Copyright: the (im)possibility of preventing criminals from profiting with literary works about their crimes