English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The following three papers were developed by one of the three lab sections of ENVS 4300, Environmental Law, in the fall semester of 2010. During the course, students participate in a series of three role playing exercises involving three environmental topics. Over the course of the semester, each student is part of three teams: one that makes a case in support of an assigned environmental proposition, one that makes a case against an assigned environmental proposition and one that conducts an impartial adjudication of a dispute. The two contending teams also cross examine their opponents as part of the process. The following three papers are based on the submissions of the two opposing sides in one of the disputes in the fall semester, 2010, as well as on the adjudicators report. These reports were produced to address the third dispute topic of the semester, “The quarry proposed by the St. Mary’s Cement Company for a location near Carlisle, Ontario, should not be permitted.”

“The quarry proposed by St Marys Cement Inc. for a location near Carlisle, Ontario should not be permitted” : Introduction