English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Epistaxis can be classified as either anterior (90% of cases) or posterior (10%) based on the location of bleeding with the division between anterior and posterior nasal septum lying at the pyriform aperture (1,2). Anterior haemorrhages can often be managed with basic first aid and chemicalor electro-cautery (1,3). In situations where these methods are unsuccessful or not practical, such as cases of posterior epistaxis, nasal packing may be required (1,4). Traditionally this involved the use of lubricated ribbon gauze or the use of a Foley catheter which is inserted along the nasal passage floor to the posterior Original Article

Cost effectiveness of posterior epistaxis management using a gelatin-thrombin matrix or Rapid Rhino