English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop an evaluation scale for early childhood education policy using Delphi survey. Method: This study selected 20 panelists as experts in early childhood education policy and evaluation, specialists in early childhood education administration, specialists in early childhood education field and parents with children. Afterwards, a Delphi survey was conducted three times to develop an evaluation scale for early childhood education policy for parents. The Delphi survey was conducted during the third phase of study to anlyze the opinion from the expert panel through content classification, frequency analysis, and descriptive statistics of mean, standard deviation, probabilities, and quartiles descriptive statistics. In addition, the content validity, consensus, and degree of convergence were confirmed in order to modify and delete the contents of the evaluation scale based on the expert panel’s responses. Results: In this study, we developed a final evaluation scale for parents' early childhood education policy scale consisting of 4 evaluation categories, 8 evaluation criteria, and 24 evaluation indexes in response analysis of expert panels. The assessment criteria included 'co-prosperity', 'democracy', 'responsiveness' and 'effectiveness', and the evaluation criteria of 'co-operative' included 'public interest', 'accountability', 'democracy' The evaluation category of 'women', 'diversity' and 'correspondence' included 'timeliness', 'suitability', 'effectiveness' as 'rationality' and 'efficiency' as categories of evaluation. Conclusion: This study made it possible to visually compare the evaluation results so that the strengths and weaknesses of each policy can be easily grasped. Therefore, we think that it will be used as an evaluation tool which can cope with short-term as well as mid-and long-term evaluation of early childhood education policy appropriately.

Development of Evaluation Scale for Early Childhood Education Policy for Parents