English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana konsepsi penistaan agama terhadap penegakan hukum kasus Meliana yang mengeluhkan suara adzan di masjid yang merupakan Terdakwa dalam perkara penistaan agama dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 1612/Pid.B/2018/PN.Mdn. Jenis penelitian yang penulis gunakan dalam menyusun penelitian hukum ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun kajian selanjutnya adalah untuk mengetahui apa yang dicakup dalam konsepsi penistaan agama dan bagaimana konsepsi penistaan agama terhadap penegakan hukum kasus Meliana. Dalam pembahasan, penulis berpendapat bahwa putusan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 1612/Pid.B/2018/PN.Mdn kurang memperhatikan nilai-nilai keadilan dan alat bukti yang diajukan belum cukup kuat untuk membuktikan kesalahan Terdakwa Meliana. Kata Kunci: Penistaan Agama, Penegakan Hukum, Pasal 156a KUHP ABSTRACT This research aims to find out how the conception of religious sacrilege against law enforcement the case of Meliana who complained about the sound of adzan at the mosque which was the defendant in the case of religious sacrilege in Medan District Court Verdict Number: 1612/Pid.B/2018/PN.Mdn. The type of research used in this research is law of normative research. As for the next study is to find out what is covered in the conception of religious sacrilege and how conception of religious sacrilege against law enforcement the case of Meliana. In the discussion, the author argues that the decision of a Medan District Court Verdict Number: 1612/Pid.b/2018/PN.Mdn was less attentive to values of justice and evidence presented has not been strong enough to prove the fault of the defendant Meliana. Keywords: Religious Sacrilege, Law Enforcement, Article 156a Criminal Code

TELAAH KONSEPSI PENISTAAN AGAMA TERHADAP PENEGAKAN HUKUM KASUS MELIANA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor:1612/Pid.B/2018/PN.Mdn)