English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This work describes the proposal and application of an instrument to evaluate the editorial management of the journals based on given concepts, categories and units of analysis. The instrument was applied in journals in the area of physical education and sport sciences, but can be used in journals from other areas. The research started from the premise that it was necessary to check what the most important criteria for evaluating the management of periodicals. These were grouped into five categories: editorial quality, dissemination, standardization, arbitration procedure and authorship. For each category there are certain indicators, specified according to its definition, implementation and scoring. It was applied in 12 journals in the area and eight reached 80% of the required criteria, and on the results are presented the strengths of all the journals, their characteristics and recommendations for editors and editorial boards. If the standardization and editorial quality categories are well scored on the whole, the same cannot be said of dissemination, arbitration procedure and authorship.

Proposta de instrumento para avaliação da gestão editorial das revistas científicas brasileiras em educação física e ciências do esporte