English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Resumen: Este trabajo parte de la evidencia de la impunidad de los crimenes de la dictadura franquista por obra, esencialmente, de un aparato judicial que ha bloqueado el acceso de las victimas y de sus descendientes a la justicia. Se concentra en la responsabilidad que pueda recaer en el Tribunal Constitucional como instancia de amparo de derechos. Su papel ha sido clave para recluir el asunto de la criminalidad franquista en la historia para extraerlo del derecho. Confrontado con Comunidades Autonomas que emprenden con decision la via contraria, como sea el caso de Navarra, la cobertura de la impunidad esta llevando al Tribunal Constitucional a extremos de degradacion de sus procedimientos con riesgo de deslegitimacion de su jurisprudencia. Palabras clave: Impunidad franquista, derechos de investigacion e informacion, derecho al honor, derecho a la verdad y a la justicia, Tribunal Constitucional, critica de jurisprudencia. Abstract: This paper’s starting point is the evidence of impunity for the crimes of the Francoist dictatorship, essentially due to a judicial regime that has blocked the access of victims and their descendants to justice. It focuses on the responsibility that may fall on the Constitutional Court in its capacity as protector of rights, since it aims at confining the question of Francoist criminality in the field of history to extract it out of the realm of law. Some regional governments, such as Navarre, resolutely take the opposite path, against which the coverage of impunity by the Constitutional Court leads to extremes of degradation of its proceedings bearing the risk of delegitimisation of its jurisprudence. Keywords: Francoist impunity, research and information rights, right to honour, right to truth and justice, Constitutional Court, criticism of jurisprudence.

eunomía

Libertad de investigación e impunidad de dictadura: jurisprudencia constitucional a la deriva = Freedom of Research and Impunity of Dictatorship: Constitutional Jurisprudence Adrift