English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Following valuable achievements over the last three decades regarding the Law of the Child and Adolescent, especially with the consecration of the Doctrine of Integral Protection from article 227 of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and the Statute of the Child and Adolescent (Law 8069/1990), the Legislative and Judiciary Powers are observed in the opposite direction, either by accelerating the process of Bill 3734/2012, contrary to the Doctrine of Integral Protection, or by the need for approval of Precedent 605, by the Superior Court of Which denounces the disrespect for bodies inferior to the aforementioned doctrine, since it was necessary to elucidate doubt or divergence on the applicability of socio-educational measure after the criminal majority. This article examines whether such measures are detrimental to the development of adolescents submitted to the prison system, as well as disrespecting the Law of Children and Adolescents.

Projeto de Lei n. 3734/2012 e Súmula 605 do STJ: o direito da criança e do adolescente esquecido