English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Prosas Profanas y otros poemas by Ruben Dario is built from its initial paratext in a polyphonic way. The title of this collection of poems is based on a negation: the word “profane” is etymologically defined as the negation of religion, which can be understood both in secular and heretical terms. Since all negations imply the incorporation of another’s discourse to be denied, it is possible to affirm that this title encloses the incorporation of a counter-discourse of Christianity. “Ite, missa est” and “El reino interior” are two poems that show how specific genres of the Catholic religion (the mass and the narrative iconography) are subverted to create their own denial. The dialogical relationship between religious discourse and their heretical counter-discourses occurs in Prosas Profanas upon the creation of effects of genericite, since Ruben Dario plays with the limits of highly codified discursive genres. The aim of the following work is to describe how discursive heterogeneity operates as a matrix behind the construction of Prosas Profanas, that is, how it relies on religious discourse in terms of opposition in order to build new meanings of a heretical nature.

El discurso herético en Prosas Profanas: ¿secularización o profanación?