English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Study of methodology istinbâth of Islamic law, good flow of madhhab Ushul Fiqh and expert of Islamic law termed with ta'ârud al-adillah, ta'âdul al-adillah and taqâbul al-adillah. In addressing ta'ârud al-adillah, the flow of Mutakallimin and Ahnâf takes unequal steps and methods; First, the stages and methods pursued by Mutakallimin's flow in resolving the first prefix, al-jam'u wa al-taufiq; Second, al-tarjih; Third, al-naskh and the last with tasâqut al-dalilain. While the Ahnâf flow, stages and methods of settling the contradictory propositions use steps; First, al-naskh; Second, al-tarjih; Third al-jam'u wa al-taufiq and fourth, tasâqut al-dalilain. Secondly, the similarity of the Mutakallimin and Ahnâf flows when encountering the arguments of the theorem, both of which use the same method, which is different at the stage of step or stage they are used. Stages and methods adopted by the first Mutakallimin flow of al-jam'u wa al-taufiq, while the first stage and method of Ahnâf flow of the naskh. The flow of Mutakallimin takes precedence over al-jam'u wa al-taufiq rather than doing tarjih, while the Ahnâf tarjih school takes precedence rather than compromise the proposition or al-jam'u wa al-taufiq.

STUDI ANALISIS KOMPARATIF METODE MUTAKALLIMÎN DAN AHNÂF DALAM MENYELESAIKAN PERTENTANGAN DALIL HUKUM