English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper uses empirical evidence to examine whether people take more risk for their own potential loss/gain and less risk for other people's potential loss/gain or vice versa. An experiment is described wherein participants had the option of taking different risks in exchange for their own benefit and the benefit of others. Results indicate that subjects take a statistically significant higher level of risk for themselves as individuals than they do when other's payoffs are at stake. This indicates that people are less risk averse in making decisions for themselves and more risk averse in making decisions that affect others. However, when the amount of reward is increased, the findings change. The purpose of the experiment is to find a better explanation for how government-owned businesses or large corporations work, where anecdotal evidence suggests much less innovation and risk taking takes place compared to small proprietary firms.

Risky Shift Versus Cautious Shift: Determining Differences In Risk Taking Between Private And Public Management Decision-Making