English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We examine the relation between restructuring charge components and stock returns for firms reporting restructuring charges in the year disaggregated component disclosure became mandatory. We find significant coefficients on disaggregated components of restructuring charges in a regression of returns on earnings, earnings changes, and restructuring charge components. We provide evidence that for firms that exhibit signs of financial distress, aggregate restructuring charges, as well as the disaggregated components of restructuring charges, are priced differently than they are for financially healthy firms. Results suggest that for financially distressed firms, investors perceive supplemental disclosure as a positive signal of the firm’s future operating performance, and view negatively a disclosure that lacks detail and/or clarity.

The Relation Between Disaggregated Re-structuring Charges And Stock Returns: The Effects Of Financial Distress