English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This scientific work focuses on analyzing the direct action of unconstitutionality (ADI) 2.656-9 / SP, filed by the State of Goias Governor aiming to declare the unconstitutionality of some provisions of Law 10,813 / 2001, the State of Sao Paulo , which limited the import, extraction, processing, marketing, manufacturing and installation of products or materials containing any type of asbestos. The problem comes from the State of Goias fact depend economically exploration of asbestos and the State of Sao Paulo is the main market. Aims to clarify the discussion points put on trial, especially the fundamental rights to health and to an ecologically balanced environment and the circumstances of the unconstitutionality and some details about the historical and economic aspects of Minacu/GO, location of exploration asbestos. Therefore, it will make use of the methods with bibliographical and jurisprudential research. The conclusions are based on the preponderance of the fundamental right to health and the environment, to the detriment of the procedures laid on the constitutional rules of division of powers between the federal entities, in order to preserve the foundation stones under the protective bias of human dignity and citizenship.

Questionamentos decorrentes da utilização do amianto a partir da ADI 2.656-9/SP