English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The devolution of tax payments based on laws posteriorly void by the Colombian Constitutional Court is not a pacific topic. Proof of this is that in relation to tesa –Tasa Especial por Servicios Aduanerosthere are two different positions related to the cause of the reimbursement. Some people consider that paying money back lies on the grounds of the legislator accountability for the damage they caused. Other people sustain the reimbursement is a way of repaying the money to the person who was not obliged to pay it in the first place. This article deals with that matter, which is relevant to choose the action to claim the repayment.

Mecanismos judicales para la devolución de los pagos de la Tasa Especial por Servicios Aduaneros – TESA