English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Legal responsibility operates under a basic idea: when a wrongful act is committed, the legitimate possibility of imposing a legal sanction to the person responsible is opened up. Being tort liability a type of legal liability, the aforementioned basic rule is applicable to it and it is a necessary condition to understand in which cases a civil penalty is appropriate. Traditionally, civil penalties are imposed when an illegal act causes injury to another person. However, in tort liability jurisprudence, some argue that civil penalties can also be imposed when different factual circumstances to the occurrence of damage as a result of an unlawful act are verified.

revista de la facultad de derecho y ciencias políticas/revista de la facultad de derecho y ciencias políticas

¿Diversas concepciones sobre la configuración de la responsabilidad civil?, ¿cuáles concepciones sobre la configuración de la responsabilidad civil diferentes a la de “hecho ilícito – causalidad – daño” se presentan en el Derecho Privado?