English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The article focuses on the methodological peculiari ties of research practice (scientific research and assessment) in clinical psychology. The author indi cates typical departures of this practice from the methodological standards of modern psychology – par ticularly from those that constitute the patterns of evidence-based assessment and evidence-bas ed practice in psychology: ignoring the primary role of psychological theories, too frequent d epartures from psychometric standards in the procedures of constructing and using psychological tests (which are sometimes pseudotests, such as Koch’s Tree Test). The importance of construct v alidity is stressed in the article.

On the methodological peculiarities of scientific research and assessment conducted by clinical psychologists