English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The victim entered into a tenancy agreement for an indefinite period with the defendant, who held only a 13.1% share in the real property in question. Due to the fact that the defendant did not admit to concluding the tenancy agreement, collecting fees on that and disposing of the premises occupied by the claimant, the other co-owner called the victim to pay the amounts due for a period of three years for occupying the premises in question without having a legal title to it. In the course of criminal proceedings against the defendant in a fraud case to the detriment of the victim, the parties reached an

roczniki nauk prawnych

A Settlement Reached before a Mediator and a Court Settlement—a Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of 23 September 2016, File Ref. no. I Aca 404/16