English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Neoconstitutionalism and the Constitutional State of Law have internationalized the legal systems of each country, since they have had to adjust their norms to supranational prescriptions, submitting themselves to the control of international organizations, such as the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights, top interpreter of the American Convention on Human Rights. This is how the judges in Colombia, on repeated occasions, have based their decisions on human rights in international treaties or conventions ratified by Colombia, therefore, in this research article, the central question is proposed What is the scope of the diffuse control of conventionality in judicial decisions in Colombia ?. The general objective is to determine the scope of the Control of Conventionality in judicial decisions in Colombia.

ALCANCE DEL CONTROL DIFUSO DE CONVENCIONALIDAD EN LAS PROVIDENCIAS JUDICIALES EN COLOMBIA