English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The commented decision concerns an important in practice, and not wider discussed in the doctrine or jurisprudence, problem of the procedure for prosecuting crimes against property, when the act was committed in relation to property of significant value (Article 294 § 1 of the Penal Code). The author agrees with the view expressed by the Court of Appeal in Kraków, however, at the same time, he believes that the issue of the mode of prosecution of the crimes mentioned in Article 294 of the Penal Code should be clearly regulated by the legislator.

studia iuridica lublinensia

Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie z dnia 29 września 2016 r. (II AKz 321/16) – w kwestii trybu ścigania przestępstw przeciwko mieniu, gdy czyn został popełniony w stosunku do mienia znacznej wartości (art. 294 § 1 k.k.)