English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective. Analysis of YouTube comments to documentaries about the fifteenth anniversary of the Beslan school siege. Background. Amid reactivation of the Beslan discourse, demand for social reflection of the tragedy is increasing. It seems relevant to address nonreactive data to evaluate framing perception. Study design. Using random forest modeling we examine the content of YouTube comments to evaluate their specific characteristics. Data. Array of comments to Yuri Dud, Ksenia Sobchak and Novaya Gazeta films about Beslan (N=141,966, upload date: 02/29/2020, parsing loss&amp;lt;1% of the total). Measurements. Random forest modeling for textual data. Results. In the comments to all three films, blame is mainly reattributed to the state. The moral performatives are different: in the comments to Y. Dud and K. Sobchak’s films there are appeals for helping victims of the terrorist attack; in the case of Novaya Gazeta — to the punishment of the guilty. Conclusions. The Beslan tragedy turns out to be a serious point of social dissociation, there is neither rallying around the state nor a consensus on how to heal the trauma.

Who Is to Blame and What Is to Be Done: Analysis of Comments to Films about the Beslan School Siege