English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in Japan resulted in the release of radioactive materials into the atmosphere, the nearby sea, and the surrounding land. Based on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Convention on Early Notification of a nuclear accident, several radiological data were collected on the accident. Among the radioactive materials monitored, are I-131 and Cs-137 which form the major contributions to the contamination of drinking water. The radiation dose in the atmosphere was also measured. This study focused on how well regression models predict radiation dose from the following predictor variables: I-131and Cs-137 concentrations in drinking water, radiation monitoring locations, and distance and direction of monitoring points from the accident location. The analysis covered 1) the correlations between the radiation dose and the predictor variables, and 2) how well simple regression methods could predict the radiation dose. The modeling techniques investigated include linear regression, principal component regression (PCR), partial least square regression (PLS), ridge regression, and locally weighted regression. The Venetian Blinds method was used to divide the data into training, test, and validation datasets. The concentrations ofI-131 and Cs-137 directly determine the output parameter dose, and thus have better correlations compared to the other predictor variables. The linear regression model with one variable (I-131 concentration in drinking water) was found to be the best with a root mean square error of 0.0133. For the other models, the root mean square errors are0.0148 for ridge regression cross validation,0.0198 for ridge regression L-curve, 0.0210 for PCR,0.0856 for PLS, 0.0892 for locally weighted linear regression, and 0.0993 for locally weighted kernel regression.

Analysis of How Well Regression Models Predict Radiation Dose from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident