English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The main argument of this article is that the anticorruption discourses of the 2018 presidential candidates, Ivan Duque and Gustavo Petro, reflect their ideologies, namely, neoconservatism and populist–social democracy, respectively. Their speeches during the 2018 election campaign are analyzed combining the conceptual analysis of ideologies developed by Michael Freeden and the theoretical framework of discourse analysis developed by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe. Unlike the vast majority of research on corruption in Colombia, this investigation does not focus on evaluating the anticorruption proposals, but rather on unveiling their ideological assumptions. It was found that from his neoconservative perspective, Duque locates corruption principally in the public sector, and therefore, his anticorruption policy proposal was limited to reforming the State, without touching the existing socio–economic structures in the country. Petro's anticorruption discourse, on the other hand, reflects his social democratic populism according to which corruption is a characteristic of both the ruling political class and a highly unequal socio–economic system; therefore, the elimination of corruption calls for the transformations of the social, economic and political structures of Colombia.

estudios políticos/estudios políticos

Neoconservadurismo versus populismo socialdemócrata. Una comparación de los discursos anticorrupción de Iván Duque y Gustavo Petro en la segunda vuelta presidencial de 2018