English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Zhang S., Yang X., Lovdahl L. (2016): Soil management practice effect on water balance of a dryland soil during fallow period on the Loess Plateau of China. Soil & Water Res., 11: 64–73. To understand the mechanisms affecting water balance partitioning during fallow on drylands could improve the fallow management practices in arable land ecosystems. A three-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of field management regimes on water balance partitioning and fallow efficiency during the fallow periods under a winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) fallow system on the Loess Plateau, China. The fallow management regimes tested were: ( i) conventional practice, ( ii) catch cropping, and (iii) no tillage with wheat straw mulching. A process-oriented ecosystem model (CoupModel) was calibrated with field measure ments and then used to generate comparative simulations of the water balance partitioning. The simulations indicated that mulching increased the soil water storage change by 38–71 mm during the three fallow periods, thus resulting in higher fallow efficiency by 9–12%, and decreased soil evaporation by 22–72 mm, compared with the conventional practice. Furthermore, water reached deeper horizons, resulting in 7 mm deep percolation in a wet year under mulching but not under conventional practice or catch cropping. The simulation results also showed that the catch cropping decreased the soil water storage change by 13–21 mm , although it lowered soil evaporation by 11–51 mm, and altogether reduced the fallow efficiency by 3–9%, compared to conventional practice. On the Loess Plateau of China mulching proved to be a sound measure for ensuring certain fallow ef ficiency and possibly benefit to the water cycle, while catch cropping negatively partitioned the water balance. The catch cropping under mulching might be another management regime to be considered.