English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This research is about the weaknesses of theories of political obligations (duty to obey the law) based on a single principle. In the history of political thought several proposed grounds of the duty to obey the law were developed, among them: the gratitude, consent and associative duties. We intend to demonstrate that the three proposals mentioned are unable to answer some problems associated with the issue and therefore do not constitute theories as satisfying the political obligations. The following argumentative trajectory: a) first, we highlight the main arguments in favor of the principles, cited respectively, and b) subsequently lists the limits of each. Emphasize the shortcomings indicate a need for a proposal multiprincipial that this will not be worked.

As insuficiências das teorias das obrigações políticas (dever de obedecer à lei) fundadas em um único princípio