Open Access10‐Year Results of Therapeutic Ratio by Intensity‐Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Two‐Dimensional Radiotherapy in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Author(s) -
Chen Lei,
Zhang Yuan,
Lai ShuZhen,
Li WenFei,
Hu WeiHan,
Sun Rui,
Liu LiZhi,
Zhang Fan,
Peng Hao,
Du XiaoJing,
Lin AiHua,
Sun Ying,
Ma Jun
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0577
Subject(s) - medicine , nasopharyngeal carcinoma , hazard ratio , radiation therapy , confidence interval , stage (stratigraphy) , subgroup analysis , carcinoma , gastroenterology , multivariate analysis , oncology , nuclear medicine , paleontology , biology
Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to verify 10‐year results of survival and late toxicities and assess the ultimate therapeutic ratio of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus two‐dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data from 1,276 patients with nonmetastatic NPC who received IMRT or 2DRT from January 2003 to December 2006. Results Of the 1,276 patients, 512 were treated with IMRT and 764 with 2DRT. Median follow‐up was 115 months. At 10 years, the IMRT group demonstrated significantly better results than the 2DRT group in local failure‐free survival (L‐FFS; 90% vs. 84%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40–0.81; p = .001), failure‐free survival (FFS; 69% vs. 58%; HR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.57–0.83; p < .001), and overall survival (OS; 75% vs. 63%; HR, 0.62, 95% CI, 0.51–0.77; p < .001). Subgroup multivariate analyses showed that radiotherapeutic technique (IMRT vs. 2DRT) remained an independent prognostic factor for L‐FFS in the T1 subgroup (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11–0.80; p = .02); for FFS in the stage II subgroup (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24–0.73; p = .002); and for OS in the stage I (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04–0.96; p = .04), stage II (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21–0.75; p = .004), and stage IVA–B (HR, 0.74, 95% CI, 0.56–0.98; p = .04) subgroups. The incidence of grade 3–4 temporal lobe necrosis, cranial neuropathy, eye damage, ear damage, neck soft tissue damage, trismus, and dry mouth was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the 2DRT group. Conclusion IMRT demonstrated an improved ultimate therapeutic ratio compared with 2DRT in patients with NPC after a 10‐year follow‐up, with significant improvement of L‐FFS, FFS, and OS and decrease in most late toxicities. Implications for Practice The ultimate therapeutic ratio of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy versus two‐dimensional radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma is unclear. In this retrospective study of 1,276 patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma with a follow‐up of 115 months, intensity‐modulated radiotherapy demonstrated an improved ultimate therapeutic ratio compared with two‐dimensional radiotherapy, with significant improvement of local failure‐free survival, failure‐free survival, and overall survival and decrease in most late toxicities and noncancer deaths. However, distant control remains insufficient with this treatment modality.