English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Purpose: To evaluate biomechanical changes measured with the ORA (Ocular Response Analyzer (R); Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, New York, USA) after Lasik with the Moria One Use Plus and to compare the biomechanics changes after myopic and hyperopic ablations. Methods: Fourteeneyes for hyperopia (H) and 19 eyes for myopia (M) were evaluated with the ORA preoperatively and 1 month after Lasik with thin flap (100 microns) using SBK-OUP (Sub-Bowman Keratomileusis-One Use Plus, Moria (R)). CH (Corneal Hysteresis), CRF (Corneal Resistance Factor), IOPg (gold-standard, Goldmann correlated Intraocular pressure), IOPcc (Corneal compensated Intraocular pressure) and more 38 variables derived from the corneal biomechanical response signal of the ORA were analyzed. The Wilcoxon test was used to assess differences between the variables before and after surgery for each group and the differences between the pre and postoperative (1 month) myopic eyes were compared with those obtained in hyperopic eyes, using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: There was a significant difference before and after Lasik in myopic and hyperopic eyes in IOPg (Wilcoxon, p<0.05), but not in IOPcc. Only myopic eyes showed a significant difference in CH and CRF measurements before and after LASIK, as well as 9 other biomechanical parameters (aspect1, h1, dive1, path1, p1area1, W11, H11, and w2 path11; Wilcoxon, p<0, 05), 8 of these being related to the first sign of flattening. Five parameters related to the sign of the second applanation showed significant variation only in the eyes before and after hyperopic Lasik (aspect2, h2, dive2, mslew2 and H21; Wilcoxon, p<0,05). There was a difference in both myopic and hyperopic on three parameters related to the applanation signal areas (p1area, and p2area p2area1; Wilcoxon, p<0.05). Differences in IOPg and p1area, before and after surgery were significantly higher in myopic eyes than in hyperopic eyes (Mann-Whitey, p<0.05). Conclusion: There are several significant differences in biomechanical parameters after Lasik with Moria OUP_SBK. Overall, the impact of myopic LASIK on corneal biomechanics is higher than of hyperopic Lasik. The parameters derived from the first sign of the ORA are more affected in myopic LASIK, whereas parameters derived from the second applanation are more affected in hyperopic LASIK

revista brasileira de oftalmologia

Avaliação das alterações biomecânicas da córnea antes e após lasik em pacientes míopes e hipermetrópes utilizando Moriá® Sub-Bowman's Keratomileusis (SBK)