English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article introduces the Brazilian experience of fighting corruption through specialized courts, presenting their creation, main characteristics, and convergences and divergences in comparison with the well-known case of the specialized court of Indonesia. The study proposes an analytical model of the specialized anti-corruption courts’ institutional design. It adopts a qualitative approach using content analysis based on reports issued by multilateral agencies, legislative and judicial documents, and interviews. While in Brazil, specialized courts receive great notoriety and resources, in Indonesia, courts are neglected in terms of financial and human resources, recruitment, supervision, and support. Different from Indonesia, the process of creating specialized courts was endogenous in Brazil, controlled and conducted by members of the judiciary in courts and lobbying other government branches. The internal movement around the policies to address corruption and the direct connection between judges and international organizations led to the executive’s support and legislation change in Congress.

dados

An Analytical Model of the Institutional Design of Specialized Anti-corruption Courts in the Global South: Brazil and Indonesia in Comparative Perspective*