English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article is based on vast research (jurisprudence and legislation) on the power conferred to the Federal Audit Court – TCU (by the Constitution and by general legislation) to analyze the regularity of public contracts. It identifies the internal value of TCU’s decisions, pointing the criterion that distinguishes provisional analysis, modifiable by the court itself (in preliminary decisions) from the definitive analysis of merit, which make administrative res judicata (as of convictions). It also identifies the external value of these decisions, showing that the Judiciary can independently judge the regularity of public contracts and render TCU´s final decisions void due to illegalities.

O valor das decisões do Tribunal de Contas da União sobre irregularidades em contratos