English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this book, Oskari Kuusela maintains that for Wittgenstein, logic is the method of philosophy. This claim would not be surprising if it concerned Wittgenstein’s early thinking. Kuusela, however, insists that logic – properly understood – is the method of philosophy even for the later Wittgenstein. The received view is that the later Wittgenstein’s contribution to logic (here is usually meant formal logic) is a negative one. But Kuusela identifies a positive role for logic and logical philosophy in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy too. Moreover, he radicalizes this view by claiming that Wittgenstein remains a supporter of the Fregean-Russellian conception of philosophy throughout

Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy: Re-examining the Roots and Development of Analytic Philosophy, by Oskari Kuusela