English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article aims to continue the scientific research of a legislative instrument for the prevention of a divergent judicial practice, namely the procedure for notifying the High Court of Cassation and Justice to issue a preliminary ruling for solving certain law matters, this time performing a comparative analysis between the texts of the criminal and civil procedure code.

FEW ASPECTS ON THE PROCEDURE OF NOTIFICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN COMPARISON WITH THE ONES FOR CIVIL MATTERS