English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The scientific approach aims to analyse a topic of particular interest, both for current doctrine and also for professional practice. The institution of notification deadlines of the court in the matters of the resolution of individual labor dispute is currently governed by the provisions the Labor Code, art.283 para.1 letter a. and by those of art. 211 of Law nr. 62/2011 of the Social Dialogue. A simple analysis of these provisions shows that, unlike the Labor Code, Law of the Social Dialogue refers to the assumptions which are subject to art.268 letter b. are not provided the letter d, art.268. Thus, the solutions offered by those regulations are different and at the same time contradictory doctrine should aim to formulate hypotheses to solve "real conflict of laws", able to avoid delivery of divergent and contradictory solutions of courts in matters which make the subject of our analysis.

agora international journal of juridical sciences

THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS REFERRING THE DEADLINES OF COURTS IN INDIVIDUAL WORK IN CONFLICT SETTLEMENT ACCORDING THE LABOUR CODE AND LAW NO. 62/2011 OF THE SOCIAL DIALOGUE