English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The most common debriefing structure usually includes at least three phases, a time to confront reactions and/or emotions felt during the scenario, an analysis of events and a summary or application phase, in which the learning acquired throughout the debriefing is solidified and the major takehome messages condensed. However, using only open-ended questions and/or the puls/delta method, participants' attitudes may remain unchanged and result in only superficial reflections of the scenario. The purpose of this article is to describe and propose incorporating strategic dialogue after the healthcare high fidelity scenario in the standard debriefing.

The strategic debriefing. Incorporating strategic dialogue in the standard debriefing after the scenario