English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A historiografia literaria brasileira viveu uma situacao paradoxal nas primeiras decadas apos a Independencia do pais (1822). A literatura, na condicao de item de um sistema simbolico que ajudava a delinear o conceito de nacao, precisava de uma historiografia para legitima-la. Por outro lado, nao era possivel cunhar uma historiografia, dado que o Brasil nao possuia ainda obras representativas de um sistema literario, conforme os parâmetros estabelecidos por Antonio Candido. O artigo trata desse paradoxo, tomando como base em textos de estudiosos da literatura e historiadores. Tambem se mostra como essa situacao transparece em tres textos do periodo: “Sobre a historia da literatura do Brasil” (1836), de Goncalves de Magalhaes; “Bosquejo da historia da poesia brasileira” (1840/41), de Joaquim Norberto de Sousa Silva; e “Da nacionalidade da literatura brasileira” (1843), de Santiago Nunes Ribeiro.  The need of the impossible: the paradox of Brazilian Literature in the first decades after the country’s independence Abstract: Brazilian literary historiography lived a paradoxical situation in the first decades after the country’s independence (1822). The literature, as a part of a symbolic system that helped to shape the concept of nation, needed a historiography to legitimize it. On the other hand, it was not possible to coin a historiography, given that Brazil did not yet have enough representative works that would constitute a literary system, according to the definition of Antonio Candido. Based on texts of literature scholars and historians, this article analyses this paradox. It also shows how this situation is seen in three texts of the period: “Sobre a historia da literatura do Brasil” (1836), by Goncalves de Magalhaes; “Bosquejo da historia da poesia brasileira” (1840/41), by Joaquim Norberto de Sousa Silva; and “Da nacionalidade da literatura brasileira” (1843), by Santiago Nunes Ribeiro. Keywords: Literary historiography; Brazilian literature; Literary system

A necessidade do impossível: o paradoxo da historiografia literária no Brasil nas primeiras décadas após a independência