English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

An issue that is still controversial in diachronic studies of Quechua is whether proto-Quechua had a palatal lateral, */ʎ/, as suggested by Torero (1964) and Parker (2013), or whether, on the contrary, it was a palatalized lateral, */lj/, as argued by Quesada-Castillo (1978, 1988). The article provides an acoustic study of the synchronic correspondences of that segment in the Quechua of Chachapoyas, spoken in the districts of Granada, Olleros, and Colcamar (department of Amazonas, northeast of the Peruvian Andes). The results obtained support Taylor’s proposal (1994, 2000) regarding the dialectal differences in this variety of Quechua, and also indicate the presence of synchronic reflexes such as a pre-occlusive palatal lateral, [ᵈʎ], a weak variant of the voiced palatal affricate, [ðʒ], as well as the unvoiced [ðʒ], which had not been previously reported in the literature. In view of these results, the study concludes that there is no evidence in favor of a palatalized lateral in proto-Quechua, but that there is a possibility that the proto-phoneme in Chachapoyan Quechua could have been a pre-occlusive palatal lateral, */dʎ/.

Un estudio acústico de las correspondencias sincrónicas de la lateral palatal */ʎ/ del protoquechua en el quechua de Chachapoyas