English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The native arteriovenous fistula (AVFn) is considered the ideal access to initiate or maintain hemodialysis therapy in patients with end-stage renal failure who initiate this type of treatment, due to its low incidence of complications and its longer duration compared to grafts and catheters.1,2 After its surgical construction, it requires a period of time, varying between 2 and 12 weeks, so that the venous path obtains adequate dilation and adequate flow, and can therefore channeled and used in hemodialysis therapy. However, there are differing trends regarding the minimum or optimal time required to consider the AVFn sufficiently mature to initiate cannulation after its construction without risk of infiltration or thrombosis.2,3 International guidelines recommend the construction of the AVFn in fourth stage of chronic kidney disease or a period of 3 to 6 months prior to the onset of hemodialysis, the time needed to obtain adequate maturation after construction. Unfortunately, most patients begin hemodialysis treatment without a constructed venous access and instead start with a catheter, exposing themselves to greater comorbidities associated with the use of catheter accesses.4

Early vs late canulation of arteriovenous fistula of hemodialisis – two concepts or trend: east vs west