English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Participants completing a 52-week efficacy and dosing randomized clinical trial (RCT) of massage therapy for knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) were invited to complete the Intervention Frequency and Cost Survey (IFACS), a web-based, validated instrument for collecting actual and ideal willingness to pay and treatment frequency data from the patient’s perspective. Of those contacted (n=179), 117 completed the survey (65% response rate). Although 95% of respondants indicated they wanted to receive massage after study completion, only 61% actually did. The primary barrier cited was cost (41%). Of those who wanted to receive more massage therapy if cost were not an issue, the most commonly preferred treatment frequency was twice per month (43%). Eighty-eight percent reported being willing to contribute $20 or more toward the cost of a 60-minute massage session, and 56% were willing to pay $30 or more, amounts consistent with the average insurance co-pay [1].

Massage Therapy: Intervention Frequency and Cost Survey (IFACS) Data with Policy Implications for Nonpharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Pain